TBCRC 032 IB/II Multicenter Study: Molecular Insights to AR Antagonist and PI3K Inhibitor Efficacy in Patients with AR Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Lehmann BD, Abramson VG, Sanders ME, Mayer EL, Haddad TC, Nanda R, Van Poznak C, Storniolo AM, Nangia JR, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Sanchez V, Johnson KN, Abramson RG, Chen SC, Shyr Y, Arteaga CL, Wolff AC, Pietenpol JA, Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 26 (9): 2111-2123

PMID: 31822498 · PMCID: PMC7196503 · DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2170

PURPOSE - Preclinical data demonstrating androgen receptor (AR)-positive (AR) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells are sensitive to AR antagonists, and PI3K inhibition catalyzed an investigator-initiated, multi-institutional phase Ib/II study TBCRC032. The trial investigated the safety and efficacy of the AR-antagonist enzalutamide alone or in combination with the PI3K inhibitor taselisib in patients with metastatic AR (≥10%) breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS - Phase Ib patients [estrogen receptor positive (ER) or TNBC] with AR breast cancer received 160 mg enzalutamide in combination with taselisib to determine dose-limiting toxicities and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Phase II TNBC patients were randomized to receive either enzalutamide alone or in combination with 4 mg taselisib until disease progression. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 16 weeks.

RESULTS - The combination was tolerated, and the MTD was not reached. The adverse events were hyperglycemia and skin rash. Overall, CBR for evaluable patients receiving the combination was 35.7%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months. Luminal AR (LAR) TNBC subtype patients trended toward better response compared with non-LAR (75.0% vs. 12.5%, = 0.06), and increased PFS (4.6 vs. 2.0 months, = 0.082). Genomic analyses revealed subtype-specific treatment response, and novel fusions and AR splice variants.

CONCLUSIONS - The combination of enzalutamide and taselisib increased CBR in TNBC patients with AR tumors. Correlative analyses suggest AR protein expression alone is insufficient for identifying patients with AR-dependent tumors and knowledge of tumor LAR subtype and AR splice variants may identify patients more or less likely to benefit from AR antagonists.

©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

MeSH Terms (14)

Androgen Receptor Antagonists Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases Female Humans Imidazoles Middle Aged Neoplasm Metastasis Oxazepines Phenylthiohydantoin Protein Kinase Inhibitors Receptors, Androgen Survival Rate Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

Connections (1)

This publication is referenced by other Labnodes entities: