A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.

Richler JJ, Gauthier I
Psychol Bull. 2014 140 (5): 1281-302

PMID: 24956123 · PMCID: PMC4152424 · DOI:10.1037/a0037004

The concept of holistic processing is a cornerstone of face recognition research, yet central questions related to holistic processing remain unanswered, and debates have thus far failed to reach a resolution despite accumulating empirical evidence. We argue that a considerable source of confusion in this literature stems from a methodological problem. Specifically, 2 measures of holistic processing based on the composite paradigm (complete design and partial design) are used in the literature, but they often lead to qualitatively different results. First, we present a comprehensive review of the work that directly compares the 2 designs, and which clearly favors the complete design over the partial design. Second, we report a meta-analysis of holistic face processing according to both designs and use this as further evidence for one design over the other. The meta-analysis effect size of holistic processing in the complete design is nearly 3 times that of the partial design. Effect sizes were not correlated between measures, consistent with the suggestion that they do not measure the same thing. Our meta-analysis also examines the correlation between conditions in the complete design of the composite task, and suggests that in an individual differences context, little is gained by including a misaligned baseline. Finally, we offer a comprehensive review of the state of knowledge about holistic processing based on evidence gathered from the measure we favor based on the 1st sections of our review-the complete design-and outline outstanding research questions in that new context.

PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

MeSH Terms (7)

Face Facial Expression Humans Individuality Pattern Recognition, Visual Perception Recognition, Psychology

Connections (1)

This publication is referenced by other Labnodes entities: