Diastolic field stimulation: the role of shock duration in epicardial activation and propagation.

Woods MC, Uzelac I, Holcomb MR, Wikswo JP, Sidorov VY
Biophys J. 2013 105 (2): 523-32

PMID: 23870273 · PMCID: PMC3714876 · DOI:10.1016/j.bpj.2013.06.009

Detailed knowledge of tissue response to both systolic and diastolic shock is critical for understanding defibrillation. Diastolic field stimulation has been much less studied than systolic stimulation, particularly regarding transient virtual anodes. Here we investigated high-voltage-induced polarization and activation patterns in response to strong diastolic shocks of various durations and of both polarities, and tested the hypothesis that the activation versus shock duration curve contains a local minimum for moderate shock durations, and it grows for short and long durations. We found that 0.1-0.2-ms shocks produced slow and heterogeneous activation. During 0.8-1 ms shocks, the activation was very fast and homogeneous. Further shock extension to 8 ms delayed activation from 1.55 ± 0.27 ms and 1.63 ± 0.21 ms at 0.8 ms shock to 2.32 ± 0.41 ms and 2.37 ± 0.3 ms (N = 7) for normal and opposite polarities, respectively. The traces from hyperpolarized regions during 3-8 ms shocks exhibited four different phases: beginning negative polarization, fast depolarization, slow depolarization, and after-shock increase in upstroke velocity. Thus, the shocks of >3 ms in duration created strong hyperpolarization associated with significant delay (P < 0.05) in activation compared with moderate shocks of 0.8 and 1 ms. This effect appears as a dip in the activation-versus-shock-duration curve.

Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

MeSH Terms (10)

Animals Diastole Electric Countershock Epicardial Mapping In Vitro Techniques Models, Cardiovascular Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Pericardium Rabbits Time Factors

Connections (3)

This publication is referenced by other Labnodes entities: