Other search tools

About this data

The publication data currently available has been vetted by Vanderbilt faculty, staff, administrators and trainees. The data itself is retrieved directly from NCBI's PubMed and is automatically updated on a weekly basis to ensure accuracy and completeness.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact us.

Results: 21 to 23 of 23

Publication Record


Antiretroviral drugs obtained without prescription for treatment of HIV/AIDS in Pakistan: patient mismanagement as a serious threat for drug resistance.
Shah SA, Altaf A, Khanani R, Vermund SH, Sten H. Vermund
(2005) J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 15: 378
MeSH Terms: Drug Resistance, HIV Infections, Humans, Medication Errors, Nonprescription Drugs, Pakistan
Added March 5, 2014
0 Communities
1 Members
0 Resources
6 MeSH Terms
Clinical decision support and electronic prescribing systems: a time for responsible thought and action.
Miller RA, Gardner RM, Johnson KB, Hripcsak G
(2005) J Am Med Inform Assoc 12: 403-9
MeSH Terms: Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Drug Prescriptions, Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Medication Errors, United States, Vocabulary, Controlled
Added February 12, 2015
0 Communities
1 Members
0 Resources
9 MeSH Terms
Possible medication errors in home healthcare patients.
Meredith S, Feldman PH, Frey D, Hall K, Arnold K, Brown NJ, Ray WA
(2001) J Am Geriatr Soc 49: 719-24
MeSH Terms: Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Guideline Adherence, Health Services Research, Home Care Services, Humans, Linear Models, Logistic Models, Los Angeles, Male, Medication Errors, New York City, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Risk Management, Total Quality Management, Unnecessary Procedures
Show Abstract · Added December 10, 2013
OBJECTIVE - To determine the frequency of possible medication errors in a population of older home healthcare patients according to expert panel objective criteria.
DESIGN - A cross-sectional survey.
SETTING - Two of the largest urban home healthcare agencies in the United States.
PARTICIPANTS - Home healthcare patients age 65 and older admitted to selected offices of these agencies between October 1996 and September 1998.
MEASUREMENTS - We used two sets of consensus-based expert panel criteria to define possible medication errors. The Home Health Criteria identify patients with patterns of medication use and signs and symptoms that indicate sufficient likelihood of a medication-related problem to warrant reevaluating the patient. The Beers criteria identify medications that experts have deemed generally inappropriate for older patients.
RESULTS - The 6,718 study subjects took a median of five drugs; 19% were taking nine or more medications. A possible medication error was identified for 19% of patients according to Home Health Criteria, 17% according to the Beers criteria, and 30% according to either. Possible errors increased linearly with number of medications taken. When patients taking one to three medications were compared with those taking nine or more drugs, the percentages with possible errors were, respectively, 10% and 32% for the Home Health Criteria, 8% and 32% for the Beers criteria, and 16% and 50% for both.
CONCLUSION - Nearly one-third of the home healthcare patients surveyed had evidence of a potential medication problem or were taking a drug considered inappropriate for older people. More-effective methods are needed to improve medication use in this vulnerable population.
0 Communities
2 Members
0 Resources
22 MeSH Terms