Other search tools

About this data

The publication data currently available has been vetted by Vanderbilt faculty, staff, administrators and trainees. The data itself is retrieved directly from NCBI's PubMed and is automatically updated on a weekly basis to ensure accuracy and completeness.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact us.

Results: 1 to 1 of 1

Publication Record

Connections

Evaluation of the use of beta-sitostanol as a nonabsorbable marker for quantifying cholesterol absorption.
Terry JG, McGill BL, Crouse JR
(1995) J Lipid Res 36: 2267-71
MeSH Terms: Adult, Aged, Biomarkers, Cholesterol, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Sitosterols
Show Abstract · Added February 24, 2014
For over a decade investigators have quantified cholesterol absorption by comparison of dietary intake and fecal excretion of isotopic cholesterol with that of beta-sitosterol as a "nonabsorbable" marker. However, beta-sitosterol might not be ideal due to its potential for absorption. We therefore carried out two studies to evaluate a new marker with less potential for absorption, [3H]beta-sitostanol. In the first study (Study I, n = 22), we compared absorption of [3H]beta-sitostanol and [14C]beta-sitosterol in a simultaneous dual-label continuous feeding ("phytosterol absorption") experiment. We observed a consistently higher ratio of [3H]beta-sitostanol/[14C]beta-sitosterol in the stool relative to diet on the first day of fecal collection (6.1% +/- 3.2% loss of [3H]beta-sitosterol, range 3-12%), but thereafter, the ratio in stool was similar to that in diet. In Study II (n = 23), we compared cholesterol absorption directly using [3H]beta-sitosterol and [14C]cholesterol, and, separately, [3H]beta-sitostanol and [14C]cholesterol. We found that mean absorption between the two methods was similar (45% +/- 11% versus 44% +/- 10%, respectively, P difference = 0.40), and the two methods correlated well with one another (r = 0.83) when samples from all available days were used. Variability between the two methods was greater in individuals who absorbed more than 40% of cholesterol. Cholesterol loss on day 2 estimated from use of beta-sitostanol as a nonabsorbable marker was predictive of absorption using ratios from days 4-6 (r = 0.80). These results suggest that, for the majority of subjects, beta-sitosterol is a valid nonabsorbable marker for cholesterol absorption.
0 Communities
1 Members
0 Resources
12 MeSH Terms