Seth Karp
Last active: 4/11/2016

Restoration of liver mass after injury requires proliferative and not embryonic transcriptional patterns.

Otu HH, Naxerova K, Ho K, Can H, Nesbitt N, Libermann TA, Karp SJ
J Biol Chem. 2007 282 (15): 11197-204

PMID: 17227769 · DOI:10.1074/jbc.M608441200

Normal adult liver is uniquely capable of renewal and repair after injury. Whether this response represents simple hyperplasia of various liver elements or requires recapitulation of the genetic program of the developing liver is not known. To study these possibilities, we examined transcriptional programs of adult liver after partial hepatectomy and contrasted these with developing embryonic liver. Principal component analysis demonstrated that the time series of gene expression during liver regeneration does not segregate according to developmental transcription patterns. Gene ontology analysis revealed that liver restoration after hepatectomy and liver development differ dramatically with regard to transcription factors and chromatin structure modification. In contrast, the tissues are similar with regard to proliferation-associated genes. Consistent with these findings, real-time polymerase chain reaction showed transcription factors known to be important in liver development are not induced during liver regeneration. These three lines of evidence suggest that at a transcriptional level restoration of liver mass after injury is best described as hepatocyte hyperplasia and not true regeneration. We speculate this novel pattern of gene expression may underlie the unique capacity of the liver to repair itself after injury.

MeSH Terms (9)

Animals Cell Proliferation Chromosomes, Mammalian Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental Liver Liver Regeneration Mice Transcription, Genetic

Connections (1)

This publication is referenced by other Labnodes entities:

Links