Jeffrey Davidson
Last active: 2/19/2015

Wound samples: moving towards a standardised method of collection and analysis.

Ramsay S, Cowan L, Davidson JM, Nanney L, Schultz G
Int Wound J. 2016 13 (5): 880-91

PMID: 25581688 · DOI:10.1111/iwj.12399

Chronic wounds, including diabetic foot ulcers, pressure ulcers and venous leg ulcers, impact the lives of millions of people worldwide. These types of wounds represent a significant physical, social and financial burden to both patients and health care systems. Wound care has made great progress in recent years as a result of the critical research performed in academic, clinical and industrial settings. However, there has been relatively little translation of basic research discoveries into novel and effective treatments. One underlying reason for this paucity may be inconsistency in the methods of wound analysis and sample collection, resulting in the inability of researchers to accurately characterise the healing process and compare results from different studies. This review examines the various types of analytical methods being used in wound research today with emphasis on sampling techniques, processing and storage, and the findings call forth the wound care research community to standardise its approach to wound analysis in order to yield more robust and comparable data sets.

© 2015 Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

MeSH Terms (3)

Humans Skin Ulcer Specimen Handling

Connections (1)

This publication is referenced by other Labnodes entities: